This is coolbert:
For every measure there is a counter-measure!
Drones back in the news in an alarming way. Near-miss repeatedly, drones nearly hitting or interfering with the take-off or landings of commercial aircraft. HEATHROW AIRPORT [UK] IN PARTICULAR A CENTER OF SUCH ACTIVITY!
1. "UK reports 70 drone near-misses at Heathrow in 2016"
Heathrow is apparently a magnet for drone pilots fond of flying their
devices near planes. According to the latest report from the UK Airprox
Board, three planes narrowly missed drones roaming the skies near the
airport last year."
NEED IT BE SAID THAT A COLLISION WITH A DRONE AT THE EXACT WRONG MOMENT MIGHT CAUSE A CATASTROPHIC CRASH WITH A TREMENDOUS LOSS OF LIFE! INGESTION INTO AN ENGINE ALSO AT THE WORST MOMENT ALSO A POSSIBLE!
DRONE WHEN WEAPONIZED AND CARRYING EVEN A SMALL AMOUNT OF PLASTIC EXPLOSIVE AN OBVIOUS DANGER!!
2. "AUDS Anti-UAV Defence System"
"Blighter AUDS Anti UAV Defence System"
DETECT/TRACK/DISRUPT. AND USE ELECTRONIC MEANS TO DO SO! AUDS!
"AUDS (Anti-UAV Defence System) is a counter drone system that is designed to disrupt and neutralize unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) or unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) engaged in hostile airborne surveillance and potentially malicious activity"
"Malicious activity" as it is deemed I might suspect a major worry for which the Blighter AUDS system has been developed. NEUTRALIZE THAT DRONE AND NOW!
Interference with commercial aircraft [a public transportation vehicle] even with a drone cannot be construed as anything less than MALICIOUS UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES! Under certain circumstances drone operators if discovered while in the act are in the same legal category as an ARSONIST and run a risk of BEING SHOT ON SIGHT?